Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
nature_of_work [26/03/2020 11:49]
127.0.0.1 external edit
nature_of_work [01/06/2020 11:53] (current)
ganesh [Tyranny of Structurelessnes]
Line 53: Line 53:
  
 **Community Markets** : It does not stop there, and communities have created their own market and payment methods clearly differentiating affordability and accessibility. In both ways any individual or community has to pay a cost either interms of money or interms of time to build the tool or use it with limited capacity when purchased free of cost - all the time with access to source code, of the software transparently sharing the proof of work of craft by the individual or the community and bidirectionally allows the reader (user/​creative commoner) to contribute back to the knowledge repository/​software repository through a social collaborative process. **Community Markets** : It does not stop there, and communities have created their own market and payment methods clearly differentiating affordability and accessibility. In both ways any individual or community has to pay a cost either interms of money or interms of time to build the tool or use it with limited capacity when purchased free of cost - all the time with access to source code, of the software transparently sharing the proof of work of craft by the individual or the community and bidirectionally allows the reader (user/​creative commoner) to contribute back to the knowledge repository/​software repository through a social collaborative process.
 +
 +----
 +
 +===== Tyranny of Structurelessnes =====
 +
 +While engaging in this trial-and-error process, there are some principles we can keep in mind
 +that are essential to democratic structuring and are politically effective also:
 +
 +  - Ordered List ItemDelegation of specific authority to specific individuals for specific tasks by democratic procedures. Letting people assume jobs or tasks by default only means they are not dependably done. If people are selected for a task, preferably after expressing an interest or willingness to do it, they have made a commitment which cannot easily be ignored.
 +  - Requiring all those to whom authority has been delegated to be responsible to all those who selected them. This is how the group has control over people in positions of authority. Individuals may exercise power, but it is the group that has the ultimate say over how the power is exercised. ​
 +  - Distribution of authority among as many people as is reasonably possible. This prevents monopoly of power and requires those in positions of authority to consult with many others in the process of exercising it. It also gives many people an opportunity to have responsibility for specific tasks and thereby to learn specific skills.
 +  - Rotation of tasks among individuals. Responsibilities which are held too long by one person, formally or informally, come to be seen as that person'​s '​property'​ and are not easily relinquished or controlled by the group. Conversely, if tasks are rotated too frequently the individual does not have time to learn her job well and acquire a sense of satisfaction of doing a good job.
 +  - Allocation of tasks along rational criteria. Selecting someone for a position because they are liked by the group, or giving them hard work because they are disliked, serves neither the group nor the person in the long run. Ability, interest and responsibility have got to be-the major concerns in such selection. People should be given an  opportunity to learn skills they do not have, but this is best done through some sort of '​apprenticeship'​ programme rather than the 'sink or swim' method. Having a responsibility one can't handle well is demoralising. Conversely, being blackballed from what one can do well does not encourage one to develop one's skills. Women have been punished for being competent throughout most of human history - the movement does not need to repeat this process. ​
 +  - Diffusion of information to everyone as frequently as possible. Information is power. Access to information enhances one's power. When an informal network spreads new ideas and information among themselves outside the group, they are already engaged in the process of forming an opinion - without the group participating. The more one knows about how things work, the more politically effective one can be.
 +  - Equal access to resources needed by the group' This is not always perfectly possible, but should be striven for. A member who maintains a monopoly over a needed resource (like a printing press or a darkroom owned by a husband) can unduly influence the use of that resource. Skills and information are also resources. Members'​ skills and information can be equally available only when members are willing to teach what they know to others. When these principles are applied, they ensure that whatever structures are developed by different movement groups will be controlled by and be responsible to the group. The group of people in Positions of authority will be diffuse, flexible, open and temporary. They will not be in such an easy Position to institutionalize their Power because ultimate decisions will be made by the group at large. The group will have the Power to determine who shall exercise authority within it.
 +
 +-- Jo Freeman (https://​libcom.org/​library/​tyranny-structurelessness-jo-freeman)